You are viewing United States

shutterstock_2617365523

Less Time Treating, More Time Feeding: How animal health can drive efficiency in the feedlot

“Time is money” is an expression most of us know well — and for the cattle industry, that phrase has taken on even greater meaning over the past decade. As feedlot operations grow increasingly complex, labor availability, reliability, and cost have become key drivers of management decisions and closeout success.

The USDA reports workforce constraints are limiting throughput and operational flexibility across feedlots, signaling that labor is not just a challenge but a bottleneck tied to workforce experience, training, and consistency.¹ That pressure is intensified by the growing need to manage higher‑risk, more variable cattle — particularly sale‑barn cattle — that require closer monitoring and timely, consistent decision‑making to maintain performance.

The real cost of labor

Labor cost is not as simple as hourly wages; it’s part of the total cost of production. Rather than viewing labor as a standalone expense, think of it as one of several inputs that drive profitability. As an operation’s workforce tightens, having fewer employees doesn’t necessarily lower costs — it shifts more responsibility and risk to those who remain.2,3

This is where labor becomes a performance variable that contributes to your bottom line. Research has shown labor requirements are a significant component of animal health costs, in some cases equaling or exceeding the cost of medicine itself. When workers are stretched, the impact shows up indirectly — through missed pulls, delayed treatment, increased retreatments, and lost performance. These outcomes raise the cost of gain and reduce closeout profitability, even though they are rarely labeled as “labor.” In that way, labor is not just a fixed cost — it is a driver of variability in closeouts on a per-1,000-head basis.4

CALCULATE THE COST OF BRD ON YOUR OPERATION

Implications of animal health

In every operation, every preventable sick pull matters — not just for cattle performance, but for how effectively labor time and attention are used across the yard. The industry average for morbidity has been reported from 15% to 45% across U.S. feedyards.5 Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) leads the charge, accounting for about 75% of morbidity cases.6 Each morbidity case requires observation, pulling, handling, treatment, documentation, and follow‑up. For cattle that require retreatment, labor demands increase due to repeated hospital visits and extended time in recovery or chronic pens. Research published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association found that the median labor cost to treat a BRD‑affected calf was approximately $15 per animal, highlighting labor as a substantial — and often underappreciated — component of total BRD cost.⁴

CLOSTAT Labor Graphic

CLOSTAT®: Helping manage risk in today’s feedyard

In today’s feeding environment, risk comes from multiple directions — more variable cattle, tighter labor resources, and greater inconsistency in health and performance outcomes, among others. Reducing variability starts with managing the number and severity of health events entering the system.

Technologies and nutrition solutions that support intestinal health can play a meaningful role in lowering the day-to-day labor burden or risk tied to sick cattle management, by improving overall animal health and resilience. In a commercial feedyard, CLOSTAT® has been shown to reduce first-treatment morbidity by 28%, translating to fewer initial pulls, fewer follow-up treatments, and less time spent managing sick cattle.7

The impact extends beyond labor. Fewer health events not only reduce the number of labor-intensive touches but also help manage risks across your feedyard. While nutrition solutions cannot replace sound health programs and management, reducing the frequency of sick cattle can have an outsized impact on how labor time is allocated across the yard.

At a time when feedlots are balancing higher‑risk cattle with tighter labor resources, fewer sick pulls allow crews to spend more time on prevention and proactive management and less time reacting to avoidable issues.

Implementing a tool like CLOSTAT can help protect both cattle health and labor efficiency — and turn your time back into value.

 

References

1USDA. (2025, Feb.). Livestock and poultry outlook. Agricultural Outlook Forum.
2United Producers, Inc. (2026). Feedlot budget calculator. https://www.uproducers.com/tools/feedlot-budget-calculator/
3Kemin Industries, Inc. (2026). Kemin BRD calculator. www.kemin.com/brdcost
4Wang, M., et al. (2018). Beef producer survey of the cost to prevent and treat bovine respiratory disease in preweaned calves. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 253(5):617–623. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.5.617
5Kelly, A. P. and E. D. Janzen. (1986). A review of morbidity and mortality rates and disease occurrence in North American feedlot cattle. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 27(12):496–500. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1680433/
6Edwards, A. J. (1996). Respiratory diseases of feedlot cattle in the central USA. Bovine Practitioner. 30:5–7.
7Word, A. B., et al. (2022). The effect of supplementing CLOSTAT® 500 (Bacillus subtilis PB6) to yearling steers in a commercial feedyard on health, Salmonella spp. prevalence, feedlot growth performance and carcass characteristics. Translational Animal Science. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac131


Have a Question?

If you have a question about our products or services, or just want more information, fill out the form below and someone on our team will be in contact with you.

Let's Work Together! Contact Us: Contact Us