Among the retorting processes tested, the longest heat treatment (303 minutes) showed a clear decline in flavor appeal, while the shortest process, just 36 minutes, consistently delivered the best results across the board. Shorter retorting times at a constant temperature clearly emerged as a key factor in boosting palatability. Higher temperatures also played a positive role, with the top-performing recipe processed at 130°C for 36 minutes (F₀ ≈ 80), closely followed by 130°C for 41 minutes, which had the highest F₀. Surprisingly, a product processed at the lowest temperature and F₀ value (110°C for 148 minutes) still ranked well against medium F₀ products, suggesting that maximum heat treatment does not always equal maximum palatability.
These findings reaffirm that the retorting process plays a significant role in shaping the palatability of wet pet food. Both processing temperature and duration influence the final sensory quality, with shorter cooking times and higher temperatures generally yielding more palatable results.
Tailoring Taste: Innovations in Palatability for Wet Pet Nutrition
While wet pet food is known for its high palatability, there remains room for improvement. As seen together, one key area is process optimization, particularly the thermal treatment during retorting. Another promising avenue is the use of palatability enhancers. It’s important to note that these enhancers differ from those used in dry pet food, both in composition and application.
In dry formulations, palatants are typically sprayed onto the surface of kibbles after processing, delivering immediate flavor impact. In contrast, wet pet food requires palatants to be incorporated directly into the blend prior to the retorting phase. This distinction means that wet food palatants undergo transformation during cooking. Flavor development occurs through in-process reactions such as protein hydrolysis and the Maillard reaction, the latter being particularly influential during retorting. To be effective, wet palatants must include the right precursors to enhance these reactions and generate a desirable aromatic profile by the end of processing.
To evaluate palatant efficacy in wet food, manufacturers often rely on similar testing protocols as for dry food; Typically, preference trials involving 20 or more animals over a two-day period. Beyond flavor, texture is another critical consideration. Producers are now looking at how palatants can be tailored to complement the physical characteristics of wet formulations, ensuring both sensory appeal and technical compatibility.
Palatants in Chunk-in-Gravy Pet Food: Where Placement Makes the Biggest Impact
One frequently asked question in wet pet food development, in chunk-in-gravy formats, is where to incorporate palatants for optimal palatability: in the chunks or in the gravy? While further research and palatability testing are needed across various formulations, palatants, and processing conditions, initial findings have begun to reveal some promising trends.
A series of trials conducted with three different palatants offered early insights. For the first two palatants, 2% was added either into the chunk or into the gravy and compared against a control with no palatant. The first palatant demonstrated a clear improvement in overall palatability versus the control, though no distinction could be made between the two application methods. In contrast, the second palatant yielded better results when added to the gravy, indicating that the carrier matrix can influence palatant effectiveness.8
A more comprehensive study was then performed using a third palatant applied at 1%. Four formulations were tested: one without any palatant (Control 1), one with a 50/50 distribution between chunk and gravy (Control 2), one with palatant entirely in the chunk, and one with palatant entirely in the gravy. Both palatant-enhanced products outperformed Control 1, with the gravy-only application showing statistically stronger results. Compared to Control 2, only the gravy-focused formulation showed a significant increase in consumption, suggesting that incorporating palatants in the gravy may be the most effective strategy (figure 4).